Collaborative information literacy assessments : strategies for evaluating teaching and learning

cover image

Where to find it

Information & Library Science Library

Call Number
ZA3075 .C66 2010
Status
Available

Summary

All of the contributions to the book are co-written by faculty-librarian teams that have successfully worked together to develop assessment strategies across a wide range of disciplines, including business, political science, education, adult learning programs, and the humanities. Saving you countless hours on course or accreditation preparation, each chapter includes a detailed literature review, a model for practical implementation, a discussion of the partnership process, and an examination of assessment data. The teams also share guidance for overcoming a variety of collaborative obstacles and challenges and report on how their assessment process significantly improved student learning outcomes. Framed in a practical, real-world context, this invaluable new resource provides a clear set of best practices to help librarians and faculty work together to initiate new information literacy assessment efforts or to improve established programs in their own institutions.

Contents

  • List of Figures, Tables, and Appendixes p. ix
  • Foreword p. xi Debra Gilchrist
  • Preface p. xiii
  • Institutional Support for Assessment p. xiv
  • Book Organization p. xvi
  • Assessing Your Courses and Programs p. xviii
  • Acknowledgments p. xxi
  • Part I Business
  • Section Introduction p. 1
  • 1 Using Citation Analysis to Evaluate and Improve Information Literacy Instruction p. 5 Casey M. Long and Milind M. Shrikhande
  • Introduction p. 5
  • Brief History of Citation Analysis p. 6
  • Information Literacy at Georgia State University p. 8
  • A Partnership to Improve Student Information-Seeking Skills p. 10
  • Designing Our Citation Analysis Assessment Tool p. 12
  • What We Learned through the Assessment Tool p. 15
  • Achieving Our Goals p. 16
  • Using Citation Analysis to Institutionalize Information Literacy p. 17
  • Ensuring Results Are Valid Measures of Information Literacy p. 18
  • Conclusion p. 19
  • 2 A Holistic Approach to Embedding Information Literacy in the Design, Delivery, and Assessment of an Undergraduate Business Program p. 25 Douglas G. Carrie and Lynne M. Mitchell
  • Introduction p. 25
  • Related Literature p. 25
  • Information Literacy at the University of Auckland p. 29
  • The Bachelor of Business and Information Management Degree Program p. 29
  • The BBIM Program Librarian p. 33
  • Developing the Information Literacy Capabilities of BBIM Students p. 34
  • Assessment in Year One p. 34
  • Assessment in Years Two and Three p. 43
  • Measuring Success and Impact p. 46
  • Further Reflections and Conclusion p. 48
  • Part II Social Science and Education
  • Section Introduction p. 53
  • 3 Assessing Integrated Library Components to Enhance Information Literacy in Political Science p. 57 Julie K. Gilbert and Christopher P. Gilbert
  • Introduction p. 57
  • Literature Review p. 58
  • Institutional Context at Gustavus Adolphus College p. 60
  • Integrating Information Literacy into the Political Science Major p. 61
  • Assessment Model p. 63
  • Assessment of Student Learning and Perceptions p. 65
  • Evaluating and Refining Assessment Strategies p. 78
  • Conclusion p. 80
  • 4 Assessing Undergraduate Information Literacy Skills: How Collaborative Curriculum Interventions Promote Active and Independent Learning p. 87 Amanda A. Harrison and Angela Newton
  • Introduction p. 87
  • Literature Review p. 88
  • Information Literacy Strategy at The University of Leeds p. 89
  • Strength through Diversity; An Academic-Librarian Partnership p. 92
  • Reflecting on the Assessment Tool: Reliability and Sensitivity p. 96
  • Decoding the Data: What Does It Mean? p. 100
  • Is Information Literacy Related to Academic Performance? p. 104
  • Evidence-Based Information Literacy Teaching: Psychology and Beyond p. 105
  • 5 Collaboration in Action: Designing an Online Assessment Strategy for Adult Learners p. 109 Julie Bostock and Susan Graves and Ruth Wilson
  • Introduction p. 109
  • Related Literature p. 110
  • Institutional Context at Edge Hill University p. 111
  • Our Collaborative Approach: Integrating Educational Theory and Academic Skills Development p. 113
  • The Case Study Springboard Pedagogy p. 116
  • Student Assessment Model p. 117
  • Course Evaluation p. 120
  • Conclusion p. 123
  • Part III Humanities
  • Section Introduction p. 127
  • 6 A Model for Information Literacy Self-Assessment: Enhancing Student Learning in Writing Courses through Collaborative Teaching p. 131 Leslie Bussert and Norm Pouliot
  • Introduction p. 131
  • Related Literature p. 132
  • Institutional Context at Cascadia Community College p. 137
  • Collaboration with English Faculty p. 139
  • Assessing Information Literacy Learning: How We Did It p. 140
  • Outcomes p. 141
  • What Did Not Work: Feedback from the Students p. 145
  • Next Steps: Refining the Tool and Process p. 146
  • Conclusion p. 146
  • 7 Vampires, Philosophers, and Graphic Novels: Assessing Thematic Writing Courses in The Big Read p. 155 Deborah B. Gaspar and Pamela S. Presser
  • Introduction p. 155
  • Literature Review p. 156
  • Writing Program Assessment p. 157
  • The George Washington University p. 158
  • Collaboration Practices p. 159
  • The Big Read: Edward White's Model p. 160
  • Examination of Assessment Results p. 163
  • Impact on Course Planning p. 164
  • Assessing The Big Read p. 168
  • Conclusion p. 169
  • 8 Many Voices, One Goal: Measuring Student Success through Partnerships in the Core Curriculum p. 175 Becky Canovan and Anne Marie Gruber and Mary Anne Knefel and Michele McKinlay
  • Introduction p. 175
  • Related Literature p. 177
  • University of Dubuque: A Culture in Context p. 180
  • The Programmatic Assessment Model p. 184
  • Exploring Qualitative Results p. 186
  • Exploring Quantitative Results p. 188
  • Analysis of Quantitative Data p. 191
  • Analysis of Qualitative Data p. 193
  • Evaluation of Assessment p. 195
  • Future Directions and Conclusions p. 197
  • Afterword p. 213
  • About the Editors and Contributors p. 217
  • Index p. 223

Other details