Rescuing science from politics : regulation and the distortion of scientific research

cover image

Where to find it

Law Library — 1st Floor Collection (1st floor)

Call Number
Q125 .R4178 2006 c. 2
Status
Available

Law Library — Special Collections (1st floor)

Call Number
Q125 .R4178 2006
Status
In-Library Use Only

Kenan Science Library — Remote Storage

Call Number
Q125 .R4178 2006
Status
Available

Summary

Rescuing Science from Politics debuts chapters by the nation's leading academics in law, science, and philosophy who explore ways that the law can be abused by special interests to intrude on the way scientists conduct research. The high stakes and adversarial features of regulation create the worst possible climate for the honest production and use of science especially by those who will ultimately bear the cost of the resulting regulatory standards. Yet an in-depth exploration of the ways in which dominant interest groups distort the available science to support their positions has received little attention in the academic or popular literature. The book begins by establishing non-controversial principles of good scientific practice. These principles then serve as the benchmark against which each chapter author compares how science is misused in a specific regulatory setting and assist in isolating problems in the integration of science by the regulatory process.

Contents

  • About the Contributors p. vii
  • Acknowledgments p. xvii
  • Prologue p. xix Donald Kennedy, Ph.D.
  • Introduction: Principled Science p. 1 Wendy Wagner, J.D. and Rena Steinzor, J.D.
  • Part I Freedom and Independence p. 21
  • 1 Defending Clean Science from Dirty Attacks by Special Interests p. 24 Thomas O. McGarity, J.D.
  • 2 Basic Science at Risk: Protecting the Independence of Research p. 46 Katherine S. Squibb, Ph.D.
  • 3 Publication Bias, Data Ownership, and the Funding Effect in Science: Threats to the Integrity of Biomedical Research p. 61 Sheldon Krimsky, Ph.D.
  • 4 Science and Subpoenas: When Do the Courts Become Instruments of Manipulation? p. 86 Paul M. Fischer, M.D.
  • Part II Transparency and Honesty p. 99
  • 5 The Data Wars, Adaptive Management, and the Irony of "Sound Science" p. 103 Donald T. Hornstein, J.D.
  • 6 The Dual Legacy of Daubert v. Merrell-Dow Pharmaceutical: Trading Junk Science for Insidious Science p. 120 Carl F. Cranor, Ph.D.
  • 7 Using Science in a Political World: The Importance of Transparency in Natural Resource Regulation p. 143 Holly Doremus, J.D., Ph.D.
  • 8 Transforming Science into Law: Default Reasoning in International Trade Disputes p. 165 Vern R. Walker, Ph.D.
  • 9 Two Models for Scientific Transparency in Environmental Law p. 193 David E. Adelman, Ph.D., J.D.
  • Part III A Public Infrastructure for Science p. 215
  • 10 Politicizing Peer Review: The Scientific Perspective p. 219 David Michaels, Ph.D.
  • 11 Politicizing Peer Review: The Legal Perspective p. 238 Sidney A. Shapiro, J.D.
  • 12 The Government Role in Scientific Research: Who Should Bridge the Data Gap in Chemical Regulation? p. 255 John S. Applegate, J.D.
  • Part IV Recommendations and Conclusion p. 279
  • Conclusion: The Imperative of the Principles p. 281 Wendy Wagner, J.D. and Rena Steinzor, J.D.
  • Index p. 299

Other details