The federal appointments process : a constitutional and historical analysis

cover image

Where to find it

Law Library — 3rd Floor Collection (3rd floor)

Call Number
JK731 .G47 2000
Status
Available
Call Number
JK731 .G47 2000 c. 3
Status
Available

Law Library — Special Collections (1st floor)

Call Number
JK731 .G47 2000 c. 2
Status
In-Library Use Only

Library Service Center — Request from Storage

Call Number
JK731 .G47 2000
Status
Available

Authors, etc.

Names:

Summary

Although the federal appointment of U.S. judges and executive branch officers has consistently engendered controversy, previous studies of the process have been limited to particular dramatic conflicts and have tended to view appointments in a vacuum without regard to other incidents in the process, other legislative matters, or broader social, political, and historical developments. The Federal Appointments Process fills this gap by providing the first comprehensive analysis of over two hundred years of federal appointments in the United States, revealing crucial patterns of growth and change in one of the most central of our democratic processes.
Michael J. Gerhardt includes each U.S. president's performance record regarding appointments, accounts of virtually all the major confirmation contests, as well as discussion of significant legal and constitutional questions raised throughout U.S. history. He also analyzes recess appointments, the Vacancies Act, the function of nominees in the appointment process, and the different treatment received by judicial and nonjudicial nominations. While discussing the important roles played by media and technology in federal appointments, Gerhardt not only puts particular controversies in perspective but also identifies important trends in the process, such as how leaders of different institutions attempt to protect--if not expand--their respective prerogatives by exercising their authority over federal appointments. Employing a newly emerging method of inquiry known as "historical institutionalism"--in which the ultimate goal is to examine the development of an institution in its entirety and not particular personalities or periods, this book concludes with suggestions for reforms in light of recent controversies springing from the longest delays in history that many judicial nominees face in the Senate.
Gerhardt's intensive treatment of the subject will be of interest to students and scholars of political science, government, history, and legal studies.

Contents

  • Acknowledgments
  • Introduction to the Paperback Edition
  • Introduction
  • Part 1 The Origins, Structure, and Evolution of the Federal Appointments Process
  • 1 The Original Understanding of the Federal Appointments Process
  • 2 The Structure of the Federal Appointments Process
  • 3 Historical Changes and Patterns
  • Part 2 Evaluating the Roles of the Major Players in the Federal Appointments Process
  • 4 The President's Role in the Federal Appointments Process
  • 5 The Advice and Consent of the Senate
  • 6 The Nominee's Functions
  • 7 Public and Interest Group Participation in the Appointments Process
  • 8 The Impact of Media and Technology on the Federal Appointments Process
  • Part 3 Reforming the Federal Appointments Process
  • 9 The Need for Reform
  • 10 On the Future of Judicial Selection: Structure, Rules, and Norms
  • Postscript
  • Afterword
  • Notes
  • Index

Other details